<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Molecular Cytogenetics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Molecular Cytogenetics</description>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/11">
        <title>High rates of de novo 15q11q13 inversions in human spermatozoa</title>
        <description>Low-Copy Repeats predispose the 15q11-q13 region to non-allelic homologous recombination. We have already demonstrated that a significant percentage of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) fathers have an increased susceptibility to generate 15q11q13 deletions in spermatozoa, suggesting the participation of intrachromatid exchanges. This work has been focused on assessing the incidence of de novo 15q11q13 inversions in spermatozoa of control donors and PWS fathers in order to determine the basal rates of inversions and to confirm the intrachromatid mechanism as the main cause of 15q11q13 anomalies.Semen samples from 10 control donors and 16 PWS fathers were processed and analyzed by triple-color FISH. Three differentially labeled BAC-clones were used: one proximal and two distal of the 15q11-q13 region. Signal associations allowed the discrimination between normal and inverted haplotypes, which were confirmed by laser-scanning confocal microscopy.Two types of inversions were detected which correspond to the segments involved in Class I and II PWS deletions. No significant differences were observed in the mean frequencies of inversions between controls and PWS fathers (3.59%+/-0.46 and 9.51%+/-0.87 vs 3.06%+/-0.33 and 10.07%+/-0.74). Individual comparisons showed significant increases of inversions in four PWS fathers (P&lt;0.05) previously reported as patients with increases of 15q11q13 deletions.Results suggest that the incidence of heterozygous inversion carriers in the general population could reach significant values. This situation could have important implications, as they have been described as predisposing haplotypes for genomic disorders. As a whole, results confirm the high instability of the 15q11-q13 region, which is prone to different types of de novo reorganizations by intrachromatid NAHR.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Oscar Molina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ester Anton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesca Vidal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joan Blanco</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/10">
        <title>CGH and SNP array using DNA extracted from fixed cytogenetic preparations and long-term refrigerated bone marrow specimens</title>
        <description>Background:
The analysis of nucleic acids is limited by the availability of archival specimens and the quality and amount of the extracted material. Archived cytogenetic preparations are stored in many laboratories and are a potential source of total genomic DNA for array karyotyping and other applications. Array CGH using DNA from fixed cytogenetic preparations has been described, but it is not known whether it can be used for SNP arrays. Diagnostic bone marrow specimens taken during the assessment of haematological malignancies are also a potential source of DNA, but it is generally assumed that DNA must be extracted, or the specimen frozen, within a day or two of collection, to obtain DNA suitable for further analysis. We have assessed DNA extracted from these materials for both SNP array and array CGH.
Results:
We show that both SNP array and array CGH can be performed on genomic DNA extracted from cytogenetic specimens stored in Carnoy&apos;s fixative, and from bone marrow which has been stored unfrozen, at 4 degrees Celcius, for at least 36 days. We describe a procedure for extracting a usable concentration of total genomic DNA from cytogenetic suspensions of low cellularity.
Conclusions:
The ability to use these archival specimens for DNA-based analysis increases the potential for retrospective genetic analysis of clinical specimens. Fixed cytogenetic preparations and long-term refrigerated bone marrow both provide DNA suitable for array karyotyping, and may be suitable for a wider range of analytical procedures.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Ruth MacKinnon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carly Selan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adrian Zordan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meaghan Wall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Harshal Nandurkar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lynda Campbell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/9">
        <title>&quot;Familial&quot; versus &quot;Sporadic&quot; Intellectual Disability: Contribution of Common Microdeletion and Microduplication Syndromes</title>
        <description>Background:
Interstitial Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been investigated. As the balanced chromosomal abnormalities commonly lead to the recurrent ID or multiple congenital anomalies, this study was designed to evaluate whether it was justified to investigate such aberrations in familial ID patients. Three hundred and twenty eight patients from 101 unrelated Iranian families with more than two ID patients in the first-degree relatives, have been investigated. Assessment of a panel of 21 common Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes (CMMS) was carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique.
Results:
Among the families studied, 27.7% had 4-12, 35.6% had 3 and 36.6% had 2 affected individuals in the first-degree relatives. An autosomal dominant inheritance of Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) was detected in a family with no clinical suspicion of WBS. The prevalence of CMMS was therefore,0.99%.
Conclusion:
This is the first investigation of a panel of CMMS in a large sample set of &quot;familial ID patients&quot;. The findings of this study showed the low prevalence of CMMSs in &quot;familial ID&quot; patients in spite of the significant contribution of such aberrations in &quot;sporadic ID&quot; which has a very useful practical impact by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests in &quot;familial ID&quot; patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Maryam Rafati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elaheh Seyyedaboutorabi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Ghadirzadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yaser Heshmati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Homeira Adibi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zarrintaj Keihandoust</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Eshraghian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gholam Javadi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jila Dastan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Azadeh Hoseini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marzieh Purhoseini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saeed Ghaffari</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/8">
        <title>Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7/trisomy 13 mosaicism.</title>
        <description>Double aneuploidy mosaicism of two different aneuploidy cell lines is a rare event. We describe for the first time a double trisomy mosaicism, involving chromosomes 7 and 13 in a fetus presenting with multiple congenital anomalies. No evidence for chimerism was found by DNA genotyping. The origin of both trisomies are consistent with isodisomy of maternal origin. Therefore, it is most likely that the double trisomy mosaicism arose from two independent events very early in embryonic development. The trisomy 7 and 13 cells were shown to be of maternal origin.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniela Barge-Schaapveld</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Inge Mathijssen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marielle Alders</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eva Pajkrt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alida Knegt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral? </title>
        <description>As a routine, karyotyping of invasive prenatal samples is performed as an adjunct to referrals for DNA mutation detection and metabolic testing. We performed a retrospective study on 500 samples to assess the diagnostic value of this procedure. These samples included 454 (90.8%) chorionic villus (CV) and 46 (9.2%) amniocenteses specimens. For CV samples karyotyping was based on analyses of both short-term culture (STC) and long-term culture (LTC) cells. Overall, 19 (3.8%) abnormal karyotypes were denoted: four with a common aneuploidy (trisomy 21, 18 and 13), two with a sex chromosomal aneuploidy (Klinefelter syndrome), one with a sex chromosome mosaicism and twelve with various autosome mosaicisms. In four cases a second invasive test was performed because of an abnormal finding in the STC. Taken together, we conclude that STC and LTC karyotyping has resulted in a diagnostic yield of 19 (3.8%) abnormal cases, including 12 cases (2.4%) with an uncertain significance. From a diagnostic point of view, it is desirable to limit uncertain test results as secondary test findings. Therefore, we recommend a more targeted assay, such as e.g. QF-PCR, as a replacement of the STC and to provide parents the autonomy to choose between karyotyping and QF-PCR.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Angelique Kooper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacqueline Pieters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brigitte Faas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lies Hoefsloot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ineke van der Burgt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans Zondervan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arie Smits</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/6">
        <title>A recurrent translocation is mediated by homologous recombination between HERV-H elements</title>
        <description>Background:
Chromosome rearrangements are caused by many mutational mechanisms; of these, recurrent rearrangements can be particularly informative for teasing apart DNA sequence-specific factors. Some recurrent translocations are mediated by homologous recombination between large blocks of segmental duplications on different chromosomes. Here we describe a recurrent unbalanced translocation casued by recombination between shorter homologous regions on chromosomes 4 and 18 in two unrelated children with intellectual disability.
Results:
Array CGH resolved the breakpoints of the 6.97-Megabase (Mb) loss of 18q and the 7.30-Mb gain of 4q. Sequencing across the translocation breakpoints revealed that both translocations occurred between 92%-identical human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) elements in the same orientation on chromosomes 4 and 18. In addition, we find sequence variation in the chromosome 4 HERV that makes one allele more like the chromosome 18 HERV.
Conclusions:
Homologous recombination between HERVs on the same chromosome is known to cause chromosome deletions, but this is the first report of interchromosomal HERV-HERV recombination leading to a translocation. It is possible that normal sequence variation in substrates of non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) affects the alignment of recombining segments and influences the propensity to chromosome rearrangement.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Karen Hermetz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Urvashi Surti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jannine Cody</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M. Katharine Rudd</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Marfan syndrome with a complex chromosomal rearrangement including deletion of the FBN1 gene.</title>
        <description>Background:
The majority of Marfan syndrome (MFS) cases is caused by mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1), mapped to chromosome 15q21.1. Only few reports on deletions including the whole FBN1 gene, detected by molecular cytogenetic techniques, were found in literature. Results: We report here on a female patient with clinical symptoms of the MFS spectrum plus craniostenosis, hypothyroidism and intellectual deficiency who presents a 1.9 Mb deletion, including the FBN1 gene and a complex rearrangement with eight breakpoints involving chromosomes 6, 12 and 15. Discussion: This is the first report of MFS with a complex chromosome rearrangement involving a deletion of FBN1 and contiguous genes. In addition to the typical clinical findings of the Marfan syndrome due to FBN1 gene haploinsufficiency, the patient presents features which may be due to the other gene deletions and possibly to the complex chromosome rearrangement.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Mileny Colovati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luciana da Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvia Takeno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tatiane Mancini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana R Dutra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roberta Guilherme</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudia de Mello</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria I Melaragno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana B Perez</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/4">
        <title>&quot;Familial&quot; versus &quot;Sporadic&quot; Intellectual Disability: Contribution of Subtelomeric Rearrangements</title>
        <description>Background:
Cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been studied. As positive family history of ID had been proposed as an important and significant predicting factor of subtelomeric rearrangements, it was assumed that the contribution of subtelomeric aberrations in familial ID would be much more than the sporadic ones. Three hundred and twenty two patients from 102 unrelated families with more than two ID patients in the first degree relatives have been investigated. Assessment of subtelomeric rearrangements were carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique. Detected aberrations were then confirmed by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) method.
Results:
Among the families studied, 27.4% had 4-12, 36.3% had 3 and 36.3% had 2 affected individuals in the first degree relatives. One unbalanced translocation and 4 polymorphic changes were detected. The prevalence of clinically significant subtelomeric rearrangements was 0.98%.
Conclusion:
This is the first investigation of subtelomeric aberrations in a large sample set of familial ID patients. Our results show that the contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements to familial ID is not as much as what had been determined for sporadic ones in the literature. Moreover, this study shows that the positive family history by alone, cannot be the most important and determining indicator of subtelomeric aberrations while it would be a good predicting factor when associated with dysmorphism or congenital malformations. These findings propose that other cryptic chromosomal abnormalities or even single gene disorders may be the main cause of familial ID rather than subtelomeric aberrations.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Maryam Rafati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Ghadirzadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yaser Heshmati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Homeira Adibi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zarrintaj Keihanidoust</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Eshraghian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jila Dastan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Azadeh Hoseini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marzieh Purhoseini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saeed Ghaffari</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Spectral Karyotyping for Identification of Constitutional Chromosomal Abnormalities at a National Reference Laboratory  </title>
        <description>Spectral karyotyping is a diagnostic tool that allows visualization of chromosomes in different colors using the FISH technology and a spectral imaging system. To assess the value of spectral karyotyping analysis for identifying constitutional supernumerary marker chromosomes or derivative chromosomes at a national reference laboratory, we reviewed the results of 179 consecutive clinical samples (31 prenatal and 148 postnatal) submitted for spectral karyotyping. Over 90% of the cases were requested to identify either small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) or chromosomal exchange material detected by G-banded chromosome analysis. We also reviewed clinical indications of those cases with marker chromosomes in which chromosomal origin was identified by spectral karyotyping. Our results showed that spectral karyotyping identified the chromosomal origin of marker chromosomes or the source of derivative chromosomal material in 158 (88%) of the 179 clinical cases; the identification rate was slightly higher for postnatal (89%) compared to prenatal (84%) cases. Cases in which the origin could not be identified had either a small marker chromosome present at a very low level of mosaicism (&lt;10%), or contained very little euchromatic material. Supplemental FISH analysis confirmed the spectral karyotyping results in all 158 cases. Clinical indications for prenatal cases were mainly for marker identification after amniocentesis. For postnatal cases, the primary indications were developmental delay and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). The most frequently encountered markers were of chromosome 15 origin for satellited chromosomes, and chromosomes 2 and 16 for non-satellited chromosomes. We were able to obtain pertinent clinical information for 47% (41/88) of cases with an identified abnormal chromosome. We conclude that spectral karyotyping is sufficiently reliable for use and provides a valuable diagnostic tool for establishing the origin of supernumerary marker chromosomes or derivative chromosomal material that cannot be identified with standard cytogenetic techniques.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Arturo Anguiano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Boris Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shirong Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fatih Boyar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Loretta Mahon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohamed El Naggar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Kohn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Haddadin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vladimira Sulcova</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Sbeiti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mervat Ayad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beverly White</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Strom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Isochromosome 13 in a patient with
childhood-onset schizophrenia, ADHD, and motor tic disorder
</title>
        <description>Background:
A small percentage of all cases of schizophrenia have a childhood onset. The impact on the individual and family can be devastating. We report the results of genetic analyses from a patient with onset of visual hallucinations at 5 years, and a subsequent diagnosis at 9 years of schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with hyperactivity and impulsivity, and chronic motor tic disorder.
Results:
Karyotypic analysis found 45,XX,i(13)(q10) in all cells examined. Alpha satellite FISH of isochromosome 13 revealed a large unsplit centromeric region, interpreted as two centromeres separated by minimal or undetectable short-arm material or as a single monocentric centromere, indicating that the isochromosome likely formed post-zygotically by a short arm U-type or centromeric exchange. Characterization of chromosome 13 simple tandem repeats and Affymetrix whole-genome 6.0 SNP array hybridization found homozygosity for all markers, and the presence of only a single paternal allele in informative markers, consistent with an isodisomic isochromosome of paternal origin. Analysis of two chromosome 13 schizophrenia candidate genes, D-amino acid oxidase activator (DAOA) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2A (5-HTR2A), failed to identify non-synonymous coding mutations but did identify homozygous risk polymorphisms.
Conclusions:
We report a female patient with childhood-onset schizophrenia, ADHD, and motor tic disorder associated with an isodisomic isochromosome 13 of paternal origin and a 45,XX,i(13)(q10q10) karyotype. We examined two potential mechanisms to explain chromosome 13 involvement in the patient&apos;s pathology, including reduction to homozygosity of a paternal mutation and reduction to homozygosity of a paternal copy number variation, but were unable to identify any overtly pathogenic abnormality. Future studies may consider whether epigenetic mechanisms resulting from uniparental disomy (UPD) and the lack of chromosome 13 maternal alleles lead to the patient&apos;s features.</description>
        <link>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Sharon Graw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Swisshelm</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kirsten Floyd</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Billie Carstens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marianne Wamboldt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Randall Ross</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sherry Leonard</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1755-8166-5-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Molecular Cytogenetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1755-8166</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

