<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1755-8166-2-13</ui>
   <ji>1755-8166</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Methodology</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>New sequence-based data on the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal male and female human diploid genomes for radiation molecular cytogenetics</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Repin</snm>
               <mi>V</mi>
               <fnm>Mikhail</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>Mikhail.Repin@yahoo.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2" ca="yes">
               <snm>Golubev</snm>
               <mi>I</mi>
               <fnm>Pavel</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>pavel.golubev@nuclear.lu.se</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Repina</snm>
               <mi>A</mi>
               <fnm>Ludmila</fnm>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>L_Repina@mail.ru</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Dzhelepov Laboratory of Nuclear Problems, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow region, 141980, Russia</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund, S-221 00, Sweden</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>Department of Radiation Safety of Human Spaceflights, State Research Center of the Russian Federation &#8211; Institute for Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123007, Russia</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Molecular Cytogenetics</source>
         <issn>1755-8166</issn>
         <pubdate>2009</pubdate>
         <volume>2</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>13</fpage>
         <url>http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/2/1/13</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">19500331</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1755-8166-2-13</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>02</day>
               <month>3</month>
               <year>2009</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>05</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2009</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>05</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2009</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2009</year>
         <collab>Repin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>The objective of this work is to obtain the correct relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal male and female human diploid genomes for the use at FISH analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>The relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the male and female human diploid genomes have been calculated from the publicly available international Human Genome Project data. New sequence-based data on the relative DNA contents of human chromosomes were compared with the data recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2001. The differences in the values of the relative DNA contents of chromosomes obtained by using different approaches for 15 human chromosomes, mainly for large chromosomes, were below 2%. For the chromosomes 13, 17, 20 and 22 the differences were above 5%.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>New sequence-based data on the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal male and female human diploid genomes were obtained. This approach, based on the genome sequence, can be recommended for the use in radiation molecular cytogenetics.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="bmc" subtype="user_supplied_xml" id="endnote"/>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>The fluorescence <it>in sit</it>u hybridization (FISH) technique <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> has facilitated rapid detection of stable chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp> and has become one of the widely used methods in radiation biodosimetry <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. FISH analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations (translocation analysis) was recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for estimating absorbed doses of ionizing radiation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Several questions of radiation cytogenetics are connected with the comparison of results obtained by FISH analysis and those by conventional dicentric analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp> and with the intercomparison of results of FISH analysis with different DNA probes specific for individual chromosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. In this connection an approach based on the calculation of "genomic" frequencies of aberrations in dependence from the fraction of the diploid human genome covered by FISH probes was developed and corresponding equations were derived as early as 1992 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>It is necessary to know the fractions of the genome covered by FISH probes at the translocation analysis in order to obtain the whole genome equivalent genomic frequencies of chromosome aberrations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. In most cases whole chromosome FISH probes are used in radiation cytogenetics. Therefore, it is necessary to know the fractions of the human genome occupied by individual chromosomes.</p>
         <p>The relative human DNA contents given in <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> are recommended by the IAEA for calculations of the genomic frequencies of radiation-induced aberrations. These values are derived from the data of Morton on the DNA contents of human chromosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, Morton's estimates of the DNA contents of individual human chromosomes are not exact because they are based on old experimental data obtained by different indirect physical methods <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> including autoradiography <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>, image cytometry <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>, flow cytometry <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>With the increasing accuracy of chromosome aberration analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>, the importance of obtaining new exact and objective data on the absolute and relative DNA contents of human chromosomes for radiation cytogenetics is evident.</p>
         <p>In the post-genomic era, with the completion of the international Human Genome Project <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>, new more accurate data on the length of human chromosomes have been obtained. In this work the publicly available genome sequence data (the numbers of nucleotide base pairs) of the human chromosomes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> are used for the calculation of relative DNA contents in the normal male and female diploid human genomes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results and discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>The total sizes of the normal male and female diploid human genomes and the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the diploid genomes were calculated by using the Human Genome Project data on the chromosome lengths presented in the Ensembl database <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. The results of these calculations are shown separately for the male and female diploid genomes in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>.</p>
         <tbl id="T1">
            <title>
               <p>Table 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Sequence-based DNA contents of the human chromosomes. </p>
            </caption>
            <tblbdy cols="4">
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Chromosome</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Chromosome length, bp</p>
                  </c>
                  <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                     <p>Relative DNA contents of chromosome pairs in diploid genome, %</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c cspan="2">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Female</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Male</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="4">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>1</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>247 249 719</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>8.1799</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>8.3135</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>242 951 149</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>8.0377</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>8.1690</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>199 501 827</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6.6002</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6.7080</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>191 273 063</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6.3280</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6.4313</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>180 857 866</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.9834</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6.0811</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>170 899 992</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.6540</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.7463</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>7</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>158 821 424</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.2544</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.3402</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>8</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>146 274 826</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.8393</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.9183</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>9</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>140 273 252</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.6407</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.7165</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>10</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>135 374 737</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.4787</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.5518</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>11</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>134 452 384</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.4482</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.5208</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>12</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>132 349 534</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.3786</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>4.4501</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>13</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>114 142 980</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.7763</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.8379</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>14</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>106 368 585</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.5191</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.5765</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>15</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>100 338 915</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.3196</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>3.3738</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>16</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>88 827 254</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.9387</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.9867</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>17</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>78 774 742</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.6062</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.6487</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>18</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>76 117 153</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.5182</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.5594</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>19</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>63 811 651</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.1111</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.1456</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>20</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>62 435 964</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.0656</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.0993</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>21</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>46 944 323</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>1.5531</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>1.5785</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>22</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>49 691 432</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>1.6440</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>1.6708</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>X</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>154 913 754</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5.1251</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>2.6044&#8224;</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>Y</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>57 772 954</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.9713&#8224;</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="4">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>The size of the diploid female genome</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>6 045 293 052</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>100</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>--</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="4">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>The size of the diploid male genome</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>5 948 152 252</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>--</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>100</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
            </tblbdy>
            <tblfn>
               <p>The sequence-based absolute and relative DNA contents of the human chromosomes in the male and female diploid genomes calculated by using the international Human Genome Project data from Ensembl database, release 52 &#8211; December 2008 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
               <p>&#8224; Relative DNA contents of single X and single Y chromosomes in the male human diploid genome were calculated</p>
            </tblfn>
         </tbl>
         <p>The DNA contents of all chromosomes, except chromosome 13, were overestimated in the work of Morton <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> when compared with the Human Genome Project data (Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr> and <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>). The maximum difference in these estimates of the human chromosome lengths (~16%) was found for chromosome 17 (Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>). The total sizes of the male and female human diploid genomes according to <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> (6 349 Mb and 6 454 Mb for the male and female, correspondingly) were overestimated approximately by 7% in comparison with the data presented in this work (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>).</p>
         <fig id="F1">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>The absolute (a) and relative (b) DNA contents of the human chromosomes obtained by different approaches</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p><b>The absolute (a) and relative (b) DNA contents of the human chromosomes obtained by different approaches</b>. <b>a)</b>. The absolute DNA contents of the human chromosomes according to the data of Morton <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> and the Human Genome Project data <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. <b>b)</b>. The relative DNA contents of the chromosomes in the male human diploid genome from <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> and results of this work (see Table 1).</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1755-8166-2-13-1"/>
         </fig>
         <fig id="F2">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 2</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Ratios of the absolute (a) and relative (b) DNA contents of the human chromosomes obtained by different approaches</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p><b>Ratios of the absolute (a) and relative (b) DNA contents of the human chromosomes obtained by different approaches</b>. <b>a)</b>. Ratios between absolute DNA contents of the chromosomes in the male human diploid genome published by Morton <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> and Human Genome Project data <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. <b>b)</b>. Ratios between relative DNA contents of the chromosomes in the male human diploid genome from <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> and results of this work (see Table 1).</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1755-8166-2-13-2"/>
         </fig>
         <p>The comparison of the data from Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> and the IAEA manual <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> has shown that the differences in the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal human diploid genomes determined by different approaches are less than in their corresponding absolute DNA contents (Figures <figr fid="F2">2a</figr> and <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). As it is seen from Figures <figr fid="F1">1b</figr> and <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>, the relative DNA contents of the human chromosomes in the male human diploid genome derived from the Ensembl's data are very close to those derived from Morton's data and recommended by the IAEA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. For 15 chromosomes, mainly for large chromosomes, the differences in their relative DNA contents in the human genomes obtained using different approaches are below 2% (Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>).</p>
         <p>However, noticeable differences (larger than 5%) were found in the relative DNA contents of chromosomes 13, 17, 20 and 22 in the human diploid genomes obtained by different approaches (Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). This result is explained by the poor accuracy of estimates of chromosome lengths by physical methods for small chromosomes than for larger ones. The difference in the relative DNA content of chromosome 17 derived from the human genome sequence data and from the estimates in the work <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> reaches the level of 9.4% (Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). Such large differences in the relative DNA contents of individual chromosomes obtained by different approaches could lead to different conclusions, in particular, about the radiosensitivity of these chromosomes and random or non-random distribution of radiation-induced damage in the human chromosomes.</p>
         <p>The coefficient 2.05 in the formula of Lucas et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp> was re-calculated by using the new sequence-based chromosome lengths from Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. The recalculated coefficients for the male and female human genomes were equal to 2.0533 and 2.0528, respectively. These values are very close to the previously used value of 2.05.</p>
         <p>Many radiobiological investigations were carried out with the use of DNA probes specific for large chromosomes because the probabilities of their damages by ionizing radiations and the levels of aberrations are highest and the translocation analysis is more effective. It should be noted that taking into account small differences in the values of the relative DNA contents of large chromosomes from work <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp> and Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>, general results and conclusions that were obtained in such investigations would be the same if the approach based on the genome sequence was used. Thus, in most cases the introduction of the correct data on the relative DNA contents of human chromosomes should not be complicated.</p>
         <p>In spite of the high-quality sequencing data there are still some uncertainties about the gaps in the genome sequence and human genetic variations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Recently, a considerable degree of genetic variations ranging to megabases in size was shown <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. The 1000 Genomes project could provide a deeper understanding of human genetic variations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Nevertheless, new values of the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal human diploid genome based on the international Human Genome Project sequence data could be considered as the best data to date.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>At present we have the unique opportunity to use precise sequence-based parameters of the reference human genome including the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the human genome instead of the approximate estimates that have been done by indirect methods at the initial stage of the Human Genome Project. New sequence-based data on the relative DNA contents of chromosomes in the normal male and female human diploid genomes were obtained. The approach, based on the DNA sequence data, can be recommended for the use in radiation molecular cytogenetics.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>The data on the lengths of each human chromosome were taken from the public Ensembl database <url>http://www.ensembl.org/</url>, release 52 &#8211; December 2008 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. The sequence-based relative DNA contents of the male and female human diploid genomes occupied by each pair of autosome chromosomes were calculated (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Briefly, the total sizes of the male and female human diploid genomes were obtained by addition of the lengths of all 46 chromosomes: 22 pairs of the autosomes and two X chromosomes for the female genome and 22 pairs of the autosomes and two sex chromosomes X and Y for the male genome.</p>
         <p>For each pair of the autosomes the relative DNA contents were calculated as a ratio of the doubled DNA size to the size of diploid female and male genomes, correspondingly. Similarly the relative DNA content of the sex chromosome X in the female genome was calculated. The single DNA contents in the genome were used to obtain the relative DNA content of the sex chromosomes in the diploid male human genome.</p>
         <p>In the formula derived by Lucas et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp><it>F</it><sub><it>p </it></sub>= 2.05 <it>f</it><sub><it>p</it></sub>(1 - <it>f</it><sub><it>p</it></sub>)<it>F</it><sub><it>G</it></sub>, relating the translocation frequency, <it>F</it><sub><it>p</it></sub>, measured using FISH to the genomic translocation frequency, <it>F</it><sub><it>G</it></sub>, where <it>f</it><sub><it>p </it></sub>is the fraction of the genome covered by the composite probe, the coefficient 2.05 was recalculated separately for the human female and male genomes by using the sequence-based relative DNA contents of the chromosomes from Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula>
               <graphic file="1755-8166-2-13-i1.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <it>C</it><sub><it>i </it></sub>is a fraction of the DNA content of the <it>i</it>-chromosome in the male or female human diploid genome.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>MVR wrote the manuscript and PIG and LAR contributed significant editorial input and original ideas. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>The authors would like to thank Douglas DiJulio from the Lund University for the manuscript preparation.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Straume</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>JW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1986</pubdate>
            <volume>83</volume>
            <fpage>2934</fpage>
            <lpage>2938</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">323421</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">3458254</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.83.9.2934</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Fluorescence <it>in situ </it>hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: Detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Landegent</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fuscoe</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Segraves</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lucas</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
            <volume>85</volume>
            <fpage>9138</fpage>
            <lpage>9142</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">282679</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">2973607</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.85.23.9138</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Rapid human chromosome aberration analysis using fluorescence <it>in situ </it>hybridization</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lucas</snm>
                  <fnm>JN</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tenjin</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Straume</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moore</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
                  <suf>II</suf>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Litt</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>JW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1989</pubdate>
            <volume>56</volume>
            <fpage>35</fpage>
            <lpage>44</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09553008914551161</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">2569008</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>Improvement of accuracy of chromosome aberration analysis for biological radiation dosimetry</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kanda</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Radiat Res (Tokyo)</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>8</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1269/jrr.41.1</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10838805</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>FISH cytogenetics and the future of radiation biodosimetry</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tucker</snm>
                  <fnm>JD</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>97</volume>
            <fpage>55</fpage>
            <lpage>60</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11763358</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Review of translocations detected by FISH for retrospective biological dosimetry applications</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Edwards</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindholm</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Darroudi</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stephan</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Romm</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barquinero</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barrios</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Caballin</snm>
                  <fnm>MR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Roy</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Whitehouse</snm>
                  <fnm>CA</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>113</volume>
            <fpage>396</fpage>
            <lpage>402</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/rpd/nch452</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15928034</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <cnm>IAEA</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment: a manual</source>
            <publisher>Vienna: IAEA</publisher>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Comparison of the yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using conventional Giemsa staining and chromosome painting</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kanda</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hayata</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>69</volume>
            <fpage>701</fpage>
            <lpage>705</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/095530096145445</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">8691022</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Comparison of dose-response curves for chromosomal aberrations established by chromosome painting and conventional analysis</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindholm</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luomahaara</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koivistoinen</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ilus</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Edwards</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salomaa</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <fpage>27</fpage>
            <lpage>34</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/095530098141140</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">9687972</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Detection of stable chromosome aberrations by FISH in A-bomb survivors: comparison with previous solid Giemsa staining data on the same 230 individuals</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nakano</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kodama</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ohtaki</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Itoh</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Delongchamp</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Awa</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nakamura</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>77</volume>
            <fpage>971</fpage>
            <lpage>977</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09553000110050065</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11576457</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Distribution of radiation-induced exchange aberrations in all human chromosomes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Braselmann</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kulka</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Huber</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Figel</snm>
                  <fnm>HM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zitzelsberger</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <fpage>393</fpage>
            <lpage>403</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/0955300031000137805</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">12963541</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Chromosome breakpoint distribution of damage induced in peripheral blood lymphocytes by densely ionizing radiation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Anderson</snm>
                  <fnm>RM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sumption</snm>
                  <fnm>ND</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Papworth</snm>
                  <fnm>DG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goodhead</snm>
                  <fnm>DT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>82</volume>
            <fpage>49</fpage>
            <lpage>58</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09553000600579231</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16546903</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Intercomparison of translocation and dicentric frequencies between laboratories in a follow-up of the radiological accident in Estonia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindholm</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Romm</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stephan</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schmid</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moquet</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Edwards</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>78</volume>
            <fpage>883</fpage>
            <lpage>890</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09553000210155888</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">12465653</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Rapid translocation frequency analysis in humans decades after exposure to ionizing radiation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lucas</snm>
                  <fnm>JN</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Awa</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Straume</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Poggensee</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kodama</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nakano</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ohtaki</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Weier</snm>
                  <fnm>H-U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Radiat Biol</source>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>62</volume>
            <fpage>53</fpage>
            <lpage>63</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/09553009214551821</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">1353776</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Parameters of the human genome</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morton</snm>
                  <fnm>NE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>88</volume>
            <fpage>7474</fpage>
            <lpage>7476</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">52322</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">1881886</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.88.17.7474</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Base ratio, DNA content, and quinacrine-brightness of human chromosomes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Korenberg</snm>
                  <fnm>JR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Engels</snm>
                  <fnm>WR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1978</pubdate>
            <volume>75</volume>
            <fpage>3382</fpage>
            <lpage>3386</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">392780</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">277937</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.75.7.3382</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>The DNA-based human karyotype</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mayall</snm>
                  <fnm>BH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carrano</snm>
                  <fnm>AV</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moore</snm>
                  <fnm>DH</fnm>
                  <suf>2nd</suf>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ashworth</snm>
                  <fnm>LK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bennett</snm>
                  <fnm>DE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mendelsohn</snm>
                  <fnm>ML</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cytometry</source>
            <pubdate>1984</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>376</fpage>
            <lpage>385</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/cyto.990050414</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">6205836</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>DNA content and DNA-based centromeric index of the 24 human chromosomes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mendelsohn</snm>
                  <fnm>ML</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mayall</snm>
                  <fnm>BH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bogart</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moore</snm>
                  <fnm>DH</fnm>
                  <suf>2nd</suf>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perry</snm>
                  <fnm>BH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>1973</pubdate>
            <volume>179</volume>
            <fpage>1126</fpage>
            <lpage>1129</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.179.4078.1126</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">4120257</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Determination of the DNA content of human chromosomes by flow cytometry</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Harris</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Boyd</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Young</snm>
                  <fnm>BD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ferguson-Smith</snm>
                  <fnm>MA</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cytogenet Cell Genet</source>
            <pubdate>1986</pubdate>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <fpage>14</fpage>
            <lpage>21</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000132190</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">3943367</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>Quantitative karyotyping of human chromosomes by dual beam flow cytometry</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Langlois</snm>
                  <fnm>RG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yu</snm>
                  <fnm>L-C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gray</snm>
                  <fnm>JW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carrano</snm>
                  <fnm>AV</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1982</pubdate>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <fpage>7876</fpage>
            <lpage>7880</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">347452</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">6961457</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.79.24.7876</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Reference standards for flow cytometry and application in comparative studies of nuclear DNA content</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tiersch</snm>
                  <fnm>TR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chandler</snm>
                  <fnm>RW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wachtel</snm>
                  <fnm>SS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Elias</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Cytometry</source>
            <pubdate>1989</pubdate>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <fpage>706</fpage>
            <lpage>710</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/cyto.990100606</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">2582960</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <cnm>International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>431</volume>
            <fpage>931</fpage>
            <lpage>945</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature03001</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15496913</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Ensembl 2009</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hubbard</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aken</snm>
                  <fnm>BL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ayling</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ballester</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Beal</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bragin</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brent</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chen</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clapham</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clarke</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
            <pubdate>2009</pubdate>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <fpage>D690</fpage>
            <lpage>697</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2686571</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19033362</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gkn828</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sebat</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lakshmi</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Troge</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Alexander</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Young</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lundin</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maner</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Massa</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Walker</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chi</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>305</volume>
            <fpage>525</fpage>
            <lpage>528</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1098918</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15273396</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>1000 Genomes project</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Siva</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <fpage>256</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18327223</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>

