Molecular Cytogenetics

unofficial impact factor 2.41

Open Access Research

Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Angelique J.A. Kooper, Jacqueline J.P.M. Pieters, Brigitte H.W. Faas, Lies H. Hoefsloot, Ineke van der Burgt, Hans A. Zondervan and Arie P.T. Smits

For all author emails, please log on.

Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, 5:7 doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-7

Published: 27 January 2012

Abstract (provisional)

As a routine, karyotyping of invasive prenatal samples is performed as an adjunct to referrals for DNA mutation detection and metabolic testing. We performed a retrospective study on 500 samples to assess the diagnostic value of this procedure. These samples included 454 (90.8%) chorionic villus (CV) and 46 (9.2%) amniocenteses specimens. For CV samples karyotyping was based on analyses of both short-term culture (STC) and long-term culture (LTC) cells. Overall, 19 (3.8%) abnormal karyotypes were denoted: four with a common aneuploidy (trisomy 21, 18 and 13), two with a sex chromosomal aneuploidy (Klinefelter syndrome), one with a sex chromosome mosaicism and twelve with various autosome mosaicisms. In four cases a second invasive test was performed because of an abnormal finding in the STC. Taken together, we conclude that STC and LTC karyotyping has resulted in a diagnostic yield of 19 (3.8%) abnormal cases, including 12 cases (2.4%) with an uncertain significance. From a diagnostic point of view, it is desirable to limit uncertain test results as secondary test findings. Therefore, we recommend a more targeted assay, such as e.g. QF-PCR, as a replacement of the STC and to provide parents the autonomy to choose between karyotyping and QF-PCR.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.