Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

FISH mapping of Philadelphia negative BCR/ABL1 positive CML

Anna Virgili1 email, Diana Brazma1 email, Alistair G Reid2 email, Julie Howard-Reeves1 email, Mikel Valgañón1 email, Anastasios Chanalaris1 email, Valeria AS De Melo2 email, David Marin2 email, Jane F Apperley2 email, Colin Grace1 email and Ellie P Nacheva1 email

1Molecular Cytogenetics, Academic Haematology, Royal Free and UCL Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK

2Imperial College, Faculty Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Dept of Haematology, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK

author email corresponding author email

Molecular Cytogenetics 2008, 1:14doi:10.1186/1755-8166-1-14

Published: 18 July 2008

Abstract

Background

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a haematopoietic stem cell disorder, almost always characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), usually due to t(9;22)(q34;q11) or its variants. The Ph results in the formation of the BCR/ABL1 fusion gene, which is a constitutively activated tyrosine kinase. Around 1% of CML patients appear to have a Ph negative karyotype but carry a cryptic BCR/ABL1 fusion that can be located by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) at chromosome 22q11, 9q34 or a third chromosome. Here we present FISH mapping data of BCR and ABL1 flanking regions and associated chromosomal rearrangements in 9 Ph negative BCR/ABL1 positive CML patients plus the cell line CML-T1.

Results

BCR/ABL1 was located at 9q34 in 3 patients, 22q11 in 5 patients and CML-T1 and 22p11 in 1 patient. In 3 of 6 cases with the fusion at 22q11 a distal breakpoint cluster was found within a 280 Kb region containing the RAPGEF1 gene, while in another patient and the CML-T1 the distal breakpoint fell within a single BAC clone containing the 3' RXRA gene. Two cases had a duplication of the masked Ph while genomic deletions of the flanking regions were identified in 3 cases. Even more complex rearrangements were found in 3 further cases.

Conclusion

BCR/ABL1 formation resulted from a direct insertion (one step mechanism) in 6 patients and CML-T1, while in 3 patients the fusion gene originated from a sequence of rearrangements (multiple steps). The presence of different rearrangements of both 9q34 and 22q11 regions highlights the genetic heterogeneity of this subgroup of CML. Future studies should be performed to confirm the presence of true breakpoint hot spots and assess their implications in Ph negative BCR/ABL1 positive CML.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.